This decision was prompted by the Delhi High Court in Nanak Builders and Investors Pvt. Ltd. v Vinod Kumar Alag AIR 1991 Delhi 315, the court having decided that an oral agreement could also be a valid and enforceable contract. Therefore, in the strict sense of the term, it is not necessary for a contract to be in writing, unless this is provided for by law or the parties themselves intend to reduce the contractual conditions to the written form. “The word `immoral` is a very complete word. Normally, he takes all aspects of personal behavior that deviate from the standard norms of life It can also be said that what is repugnant to the good conscience is immoral. Its different content depends on the time, place and stage of civilization of a given society. The other restriction imposed on the word by the statue, namely “the courts consider immoral”, suggests that it is also a branch of the common law, such as the doctrine of public order, and should therefore be limited to principles recognized and regulated by the courts. Precedents limit this concept only to sexual immorality and no case has been brought to our attention in which it has been applied to any head other than sexual immorality. In the current circumstances, we cannot take a new head to put bets in his herd. 5. Reflection 2 (d): If the promising or any other person has done something or abstained at the request of the promiser, or abstains or renounces, or promises to do something or promises to do nothing, such an act or abstinence or promise is called in return for the promise.